Five Big Lies about Climate Change and How Researchers Trained


Climate science has been established. Why are climate denialists still spreading misinformation online? This pioneering project provides new insight into climate change claims and their origins.

The study was published in Nature Scientific Reports. The study was published by Nature Scientific Reports.

“One of the most valuable insights from our research was identifying the most prevalent categories of climate misinformation–attacks on the integrity of climate science, and misinformation targeting climate solutions,” said a postdoctoral fellow with the Climate Change Communication Research Hub at Monash University, John Cook, is a study author. This shows how important it is to use a model to provide an objective and quantitative analysis. I knew science myths were more common than they are. They made up only a tiny percentage of climate misinformation, however.

The team began with sorting climate-related information from 33 climate-contrarian blogs. They came up with five main themes. 1) Global warming is unlikely; 2) Human-produced global heating gasses are not causing global warming; 3) Climate effects won’t be severe; and 4) Climate solutions will not work. HTML5_

These five main themes consist of 47 subclaims as well 49 subsub-claims. They include the boring, “scientists can bias” trope and a totally irrelevant, but true, “CO2is trace gas” rhetorical ploy.


Best Travel Insurance Companies


Best Covid-19 Travel Insurance Plans


These categories were then used to perform the “largest content assessment ever” of contrarian claims, according to researchers.


This analysis proved that climate misinformation was not based upon climate myths like the belief that recent global warming was caused by a natural process. It instead focuses on debunking the climate research and proposing ways of preparing for and mitigating climate changes.

Due to overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change was caused by humans, Cook stated that climate denial was unlikely to be made. Climate activists have shifted to misinformation to try to derail climate policy. “

He stated that this is an important aspect in climate fact-checking. Most people are too focused on science myths, and neglect common forms of climate misinformation.

Chart showing all the contradictory claims that conservative think makes about climate change. [+]


Although the COP26 summit did not reach a perfect conclusion, researchers pointed out that it did demonstrate that the international community accepts the physical science basis for climate change. Joeri ROGLJ (director of research and lecturer in climate at the Grantham Institute Imperial College London) stated, “I’m proud because science never features so strongly in COP decisions. They are able to define and communicate the urgency of the issues ahead.

Groups such as the Union of Concerned Scientists claim rich special interests groups, which include fossil fuel corporations, continue spreading misinformation in an effort to delay climate action.

Cook stated, “Ultimately, climate misinformation serves climate action. It could be the argument that global heating isn’t happening’ or the unreliability of climate models.


This report provides an insight into where climate misinformation money comes from. They include the ExxonMobil Foundation as well as Donors Capital Fund, Koch Affiliated Foundations and Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program. It is Vanguard Investments, which was revealed as the biggest investor in the global coal sector to the tune of $86 billion.

Now that climate misinformation can be categorized, and is generally understood by the public, what are we to do?

Research from the University of Cambridge revealed that some climate myths were very popular among 1,722 respondents. However, most people are able to spot fake headlines. This could help the audience develop mental antibodies to detect misinformation in future. “

Cook stated that to counter climate misinformation, it was necessary to combine machine learning research results with critical thought research. These research should identify misleading rhetorical techniques and logic flaws within each misinformation claim. Combining these two distinct research lines will allow us to get closer towards the holy grail known as fact-checking.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here